John Stuart Mill: Freedom of Speech and Tolerating the Intolerable
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page discussion of Mills views on the importance of Freedom of Speech. Uses Supreme Court cases to reinforce Mills view of negative freedom and tolerating the intolerable in order to provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number of people. Suggests that Mill is correct and that even speech which could be construed as hate speech should be protected under the freedom of speech guarantee of the Constitution. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: PPmillSp.wps

Judicial Bias
[ send me this paper ]
A 19 page research paper on judicial bias and its various forms. The writer details conservative and liberal bias in the federal courts, ideological bias, racial and sex bias, and corruption. Bibliography lists 15 sources.
Filename: Judgbias.wps

Judicial Branch
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page paper which discusses the judicial branch of the government, presenting how different courts function. Some basic information is provided in relationship to legal terms, and the power maintained by judges, which further illustrates the conditions and realities directly linked with the judicial system we know today. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: RAjudbrnc.wps

Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism
[ send me this paper ]
This 10 page paper examines judicial review and looks at these two juxtaposed concepts. Specific cases are discussed in depth in order to demonstrate examples of judicial restraint and judicial activism. Bibliography lists 7 sources
Filename: SA142jst.rtf

Judicial Review
[ send me this paper ]
The debate over whether or not the courts should embrace judicial restraint or judicial activism is reviewed in this 5 page paper. The purpose of judicial review is discussed. Roe v. Wade is highlighted as an example of a case that continues to be discussed as both an exemplification of restraint and review. Robert Bork is portrayed as a contemporary philosopher who supports restraint, or even discarding review altogether. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Filename: Judrev.wps

Judicial Review
[ send me this paper ]
(5 pp) In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton said that "the judiciary... has no influence over either the sword or the purse...it may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment...the judiciary is beyond comparison, the weakest of the three departments of power...".In this discussion we will assess the validity of Hamilton's comments in light of recent Supreme Court decisions. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Filename: BBjudrev.doc

Judicial Review # 2
[ send me this paper ]
In 6 pages, the writer discusses the concept of judicial review, what it is, how it works, agencies involved, etc. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: Jrev2.wps

Judicial Review & Its Ultimate Impact Upon Public Administration/Book Review
[ send me this paper ]
4 pages in length. An analytical review of Earl M. Maltz's book entitled "Rethinking Constitutional Law: Originalism, Interventionism, and the Politics of Judicial Review" in which the writer finds Maltz's views to be unrealistic because they tend to de-recognize the human qualities of judicial members. This essay largely examines political participation and its role in public administration. Standard bibliography lists more than 10 sources and a Free annotated bibliography details their usage in brief. Please send us e-mail for more details.
Filename: Judicial.wps

Judicial Review and the Marbury vs. Madison debate
[ send me this paper ]
7 pages. This paper will consider whether the exercise of the judicial review is legitimate. The question here is whether judges who are not elected should be able to overturn the actions of a democratically elected legislature. Ever since Marbury v. Madison, a debate has raged about this question. Within this paper the debate is researched, and the major points for and against judicial review are pointed out, as well as which side appears to have the stronger argument and why. Bibliography lists 9 sources.
Filename: JGAjudrv.wps

Justice John Paul Stevens
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page paper that provides a brief biographical sketch of Justice Stevens and his appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States. The paper includes examples that demonstrate Stevens is willing to be the lone dissenting vote on the Court or among the minority that promote an unpopular vote. Stevens was one of three who dissented from the Court's ruling to stop the manual recount of presidential election ballots in Florida. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: PGstevns.rtf